FinTech Alliance PH Seats a Board Built for Regulatory Influence

The country’s largest digital finance industry body is no longer just convening members. It is organizing them around policy.

The Bottom Line

• FinTech Alliance PH announced its 2026 Board of Trustees on April 6, pulling executives from GCash, Maya, Maribank, Coins.ph, Uno Digital Bank, Home Credit, Bayad Center, SGV/EY, Atram Trust, Pru Life UK, and Disini Law Office under a single governance body.
• The board composition is the signal. It places payments, digital banking, lending, insurtech, legal, and audit leadership on the same table at a time when BSP supervision is tightening across all those verticals.
• FinTech Alliance PH now represents over 150 corporate members and claims to account for more than 95 percent of retail digital financial transaction volume in the country.
• Chairman Lito Villanueva, who also serves as EVP and Chief Innovation and Inclusion Officer at RCBC, stays in place for continuity. His dual role links the Alliance directly to a major universal bank with its own fintech operations.
• The Alliance stated it will “deepen regulatory engagement” and push open finance frameworks, a phrase that signals organized policy lobbying, not just industry networking.

---

The Philippine fintech sector is past its expansion-only phase. The market has moved from a race to acquire digital wallets to a period where the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas is actively recalibrating rules around digital banking capitalization, lending transparency, open finance interoperability, and cybersecurity compliance. When the regulatory environment shifts from permissive to structured, the companies that participate in writing the rules hold a structural advantage over those that simply react to them.

That is the context behind FinTech Alliance PH seating its 2026 Board of Trustees. On April 6, the industry body announced a 12-member board drawn from the leadership of the country’s most significant digital finance players. This is not a ceremonial rotation. The board’s breadth across payments, digital banking, insurance, lending, legal, and audit functions reads as a deliberate alignment of sector interests ahead of a regulatory tightening cycle.

The FinTech Alliance PH Board Composition Tells the Story

The 2026 board includes Oscar Enrico Reyes Jr. of GCash, Angelo Madrid of Maya Philippines, Martha Elaine Borja of Maribank Philippines (the Grab-linked digital bank), Lawrence Ferrer of CIS Bayad Center, Zdenek Jankovsky of Home Credit Philippines, Christian Lauron of SGV and Co./Ernst and Young, Deanno Basas of Atram Trust Corp., JJ Disini of Disini Law Office, Imelda Tiongson of Pru Life UK, Manish Bhai of Uno Digital Bank, Griselda Santos of FinTech Alliance PH, and Wei Zhou of Coins.ph. Atty. Aiken Larisa Serzo of Disini and Disini Law Office serves as corporate secretary.

Read the names by function, not just by company. You have the two dominant e-wallet operators (GCash and Maya), a Grab-backed digital bank (Maribank), a Singapore-headquartered digital lender (Home Credit), a crypto exchange operator (Coins.ph), an independently licensed digital bank (Uno), the country’s largest bills payment network (Bayad Center), a major wealth management firm (Atram Trust), the Philippine arm of a global insurer (Pru Life UK), the country’s most prominent fintech law practice (Disini), and the Big Four audit firm that handles regulatory compliance for half the sector (SGV/EY).

That is not a networking board. That is a policy coordination board.

What “Deepening Regulatory Engagement” Means in Practice

FinTech Alliance PH stated that the new board will “deepen regulatory engagement, accelerate innovation across its network, and further position the Philippines as a leading fintech hub in Southeast Asia.” Strip the PR framing and what remains is a clear statement of intent: the Alliance plans to operate as an organized interlocutor between its member companies and Philippine financial regulators.

This matters because the BSP is actively moving on several fronts that will reshape competitive dynamics. The central bank has been working on guidelines to assess the “digital centricity” of thrift banks, rural banks, and cooperative banks, which would subject hybrid lenders to the same capitalization and prudential requirements as fully licensed digital banks. The Open Finance Framework, which governs how customer financial data moves between institutions, is maturing. Cross-border instant payment connectivity through the BIS Project Nexus is targeting a July 2026 launch. Digital lending standards and AI governance in credit decisioning are on the regulatory horizon.

Each of these regulatory workstreams creates winners and losers. The firms that sit at the table when standards are drafted get to shape compliance baselines in ways that align with their existing operations. The firms that do not sit at the table absorb the compliance cost without having shaped the rules. FinTech Alliance PH, by consolidating leadership from across the sector’s verticals into a single governance structure, is positioning itself as the primary private-sector channel for that conversation.

The Coordination Advantage and Who It Exposes

The Alliance’s claim of representing over 95 percent of retail digital financial transaction volume in the Philippines is worth interrogating. If accurate, it means nearly all commercially significant digital finance activity in the country runs through companies with direct representation on or membership in this body. That concentration gives the Alliance legitimate standing when it approaches regulators, but it also means the policy positions it advocates will reflect the interests of scaled operators.

The exposed players are smaller fintech firms, rural digital lenders, and early-stage operators that compete on product speed and niche positioning but lack institutional representation when licensing frameworks, interoperability standards, or consumer protection rules are negotiated. As Philippine fintech regulation moves from broad encouragement toward specific compliance mandates, the gap between firms that can influence rule-making and firms that cannot will widen.

The Alliance was the first digital industry organization in the Philippines to adopt an industry-led Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics. It co-founded the Asia FinTech Alliance, which spans 15 member economies. These are not just credentials. They are institutional infrastructure that gives the Alliance credibility when it proposes standards to regulators, because it can point to existing self-governance as evidence that industry-led frameworks work.

Villanueva’s Dual Role Is Part of the Design

Lito Villanueva’s continuation as chairman connects two significant threads. As EVP and Chief Innovation and Inclusion Officer at RCBC, he operates inside a major Philippine universal bank that runs its own digital banking and fintech operations. As chairman of FinTech Alliance PH, he leads the industry body that represents both digital-native firms and the digital arms of traditional banks.

That dual positioning is not a conflict. It is the point. The next phase of Philippine fintech regulation will require bridging between traditional banking supervision and digital-native business models. Having the Alliance led by someone who operates inside both worlds gives the organization a structural advantage in those conversations.

Where This Goes

FinTech Alliance PH is not making a product announcement. It is making a governance announcement, and in a market entering a regulatory tightening cycle, governance is where competitive advantage gets built. The companies on this board will not agree on everything. GCash and Maya are direct competitors. Home Credit and Uno Digital Bank operate in adjacent but different lending markets. Coins.ph sits in a regulatory category that the rest of the board barely touches. But their shared interest in shaping the compliance environment, rather than being shaped by it, is enough to hold the coordination together.

For operators, investors, and market watchers tracking Philippine digital finance, the signal is clear: the next round of competition will be fought as much in regulation as in product. The firms organizing around that reality now are the ones likely to set the terms.

---

Monitor the systems, tools, and digital infrastructure decisions redefining competitive advantage in the Tech section of Hemos PH.