What It Means
- The new SEC auditor accreditation standard reserves Group A status only for firms with no material deficiency findings, removing the conditional path that currently exists under Rule 68.
- Isla Lipana & Co., PwC’s Philippine affiliate, faces criminal charges against two partners tied to the MFT Group case and is the direct trigger for the reform.
- A smaller Group A roster, the direct result of the MFT Group case, concentrates audit work among fewer firms, giving the survivors more room to set fees and terms with listed clients.
- Punongbayan & Araullo’s refusal to sign off on a Villar-led company’s ₱1.8 trillion valuation, cut to ₱200 billion before it accepted the audit, shows accreditation reform does not touch the leverage a client holds over its own auditor.

Commissioner Rogelio Quevedo used a Monday press briefing to describe SEC auditor accreditation rules that are still being drafted but already reshaping who gets to audit a listed company, rules he tied directly to the fallout from the MFT Group case. The rules would limit Group A classification, the SEC’s top tier for external auditors, to firms with no findings of material deficiency from the regulator’s Office of the General Accountant. A firm can currently carry a deficiency finding and still qualify for conditional accreditation. The new rule removes that middle ground.
SEC Auditor Accreditation Now Excludes Any Deficiency Finding
SEC auditor accreditation currently runs through Rule 68 of the Securities Regulation Code’s implementing rules, which considers audit work acceptable if there is no material disclosure deficiency or misstatement in a reviewed client’s financial statements. Firms that fall short have historically kept a path back to Group A through conditional accreditation. Quevedo’s description removes that path for the top tier. Group A membership under the new SEC auditor accreditation standard becomes binary: a clean OGA record or no top classification at all.
The Supreme Court settled the legal question underneath this in January 2025, reversing two earlier rulings and confirming the SEC’s full authority to accredit external auditors of companies with registered securities and secondary licenses. That closed off the argument that accreditation belongs solely to the Board of Accountancy.
Isla Lipana Carries the MFT Group Case That Forced the Rule
The SEC auditor accreditation overhaul traces directly to Isla Lipana & Co., the PwC-affiliated firm that audited the MFT Group of Companies from 2018 to 2021. MFT Group, founded by Maria Francesca “Mica” Tan, is the case the SEC keeps naming when it explains why the rule exists. The SEC has filed criminal charges against two of Isla Lipana’s partners over that engagement, and Quevedo said both, now removed from the firm and stripped of retirement benefits, have offered to testify against MFT Group officers. He also flagged that MFT Group’s chief financial officer was never indicted, a gap that leaves Tan’s own inner circle only partly accounted for.
Isla Lipana has denied wrongdoing and said it would cooperate with the Department of Justice investigation. That denial has not slowed the rewrite. The MFT Group engagement, one firm, one client, is functioning as the working case study for a rule that will apply to every accredited auditor in the country.
A Smaller Group A Roster Concentrates Market Leverage
The immediate effect of tighter SEC auditor accreditation is arithmetic before it is anything else. Fewer firms will clear a zero-deficiency bar than clear today’s conditional standard. That shrinks the pool of auditors a listed company can hire without triggering accreditation questions, and a smaller pool does not lower prices. It raises them, because an issuer needing a Group A audit now has fewer firms to choose from and less room to negotiate fees or timelines.
The firms most likely to clear the new bar are the large, multinational-affiliated players with the compliance infrastructure to avoid deficiency findings in the first place. The reform closes the door that let the MFT Group engagement through, but the same door swings shut on smaller firms with clean books that lack the scale to absorb a single flagged finding.
The Villar Valuation Dispute Shows What the Rule Does Not Fix
Quevedo raised a second case in the same briefing that SEC auditor accreditation reform leaves untouched. Punongbayan & Araullo refused to sign audited financial statements for Villar-led companies until the group agreed to cut a disputed valuation from ₱1.8 trillion to ₱200 billion. That standoff shows an auditor holding a client’s numbers in check, but it also shows the leverage runs both ways. The client set the terms, and the auditor’s signature stayed withheld until agreement was reached.
Six Villar-led companies were separately penalized by the Philippine Stock Exchange last week for missing extended deadlines on quarterly reports. The MFT Group case was an auditor signing off on numbers that should not have cleared. The Villar case is an auditor refusing to sign until the numbers changed. A rule built around deficiency findings addresses the first pattern. It does not touch the second.
Listed Companies Inherit the Transition Cost
Every company audited by a firm that loses Group A status faces a forced transition, and that lands hardest on mid-cap issuers without the finance staff to manage an auditor switch on short notice. Isla Lipana’s prior client roster included Ayala Land, Bank of the Philippine Islands, and Globe Telecom, all of which had already rotated auditors under separate ten-year rules well before this reform. The companies genuinely exposed are the smaller listed names that never had the standing to demand early rotation and are now watching their accreditation options narrow at the same time.
The criminal case against Mica Tan and MFT Group’s officers already showed that regulatory response in the Philippines arrives years after the underlying conduct. The record of cease and desist orders and prosecutorial delay built the case for a structural fix, not just a criminal filing against one group of companies. SEC auditor accreditation reform is that fix, and MFT Group is the reason it exists.
A smaller Group A roster does not eliminate audit failure. It changes who has the standing to demand better terms from the firms left after the MFT Group case forced the cut.
Track more regulatory shifts that affect your business in Policy & Regulation section of Hemos PH.




