What It Means
- The CADENA Act blockchain budget plan cleared the Senate by a unanimous 17-0 vote in December 2025 and carries a presidential certification behind it.
- Eight months later, the House counterpart bill sits inside the Committee on Information and Communications Technology with no scheduled floor vote.
- The mandatory disclosure requirement, not the blockchain layer, is the part of the bill that actually changes how public money gets tracked.
- Agencies and contractors currently operating under opaque procurement rules absorb no new scrutiny until the House moves the bill forward.
- The committee holding the bill, not the public pressure campaign built around it, decides whether this becomes law before the current Congress adjourns.
The CADENA Act blockchain budget plan passed the Senate by a unanimous vote in December 2025, carrying a certification from President Marcos as urgent legislation. Eight months later, it has not received a single floor vote in the House of Representatives. Sen. Bam Aquino, the bill’s principal author, marked that anniversary this week with a public post pushing his colleagues in the Lower House to move faster, framing the delay as a test of how serious government actually is about tracking where public money goes.
The bill itself reads simply enough on paper. Senate Bill 1506 mandates that government agencies upload contracts, project costs, bills of materials, and procurement records onto a Digital Budget Portal at every stage of the budget cycle, not after an audit or a scandal forces the documents into the open. What has happened to the bill since December says more about how Philippine reform legislation actually moves than the bill’s own text does.
The Bill Passed. The Mandate Did Not.
Aquino filed Senate Bill 1506, the Citizen Access and Disclosure of Expenditures for National Accountability Act (CADENA Act), in November 2025, directly in response to the flood control corruption scandal that exposed how easily project costs and contractor identities disappear from public view once funds leave the national budget. The Senate approved it on third reading in a 17-0 vote with no abstentions, and Marcos listed it among four priority reform measures he wanted Congress to pass without delay.
Under the bill, every government agency, government owned or controlled corporation, and their subsidiaries would be required to publish budget documents covering the full cycle, from allocation to disbursement, on a portal designed to be public, tamper resistant, traceable, and open source. Two House versions exist. Rep. Javier Miguel Benitez filed the original counterpart, House Bill 6761. Rep. Leila de Lima later filed House Bill 6898, which fully adopts the Senate’s language rather than proposing a competing version. Neither has reached the floor. The CADENA Act blockchain budget plan, as written, cannot become law until one of these House bills clears committee, gets reconciled with the Senate version, and reaches the President’s desk.
Blockchain Is the Marketing. Disclosure Is the Mechanism.
The CADENA Act’s branding leans hard on blockchain, and that framing is doing more work for headlines than for the actual accountability outcome. What changes behavior here is not the ledger technology. It is the timing of disclosure. Under CADENA, contracts and cost breakdowns get uploaded as the budget moves through each stage, not reconstructed months later when a journalist or an ombudsman investigation forces the paper trail into view. A properly access logged, append only database delivers the same tamper resistant record without requiring a national blockchain build that Philippine government IT teams have a mixed record of executing on schedule.
That mixed record has a recent, direct precedent. When COMELEC trimmed roughly ₱6 billion from a ₱25 billion 2028 election preparation request, it removed blockchain components and a ballot verification feature in the same motion, both labeled nonessential. Blockchain voting receipts had never played an established role in Philippine elections, so cutting that line changed little. The verification feature was the item that mattered, and it got filed under the same throwaway label because blockchain had absorbed most of the public attention in the first place. The CADENA Act blockchain budget plan risks a version of the same problem in reverse: attaching a genuinely useful disclosure mandate to a technology dependency that becomes the excuse for delay, cost overruns, or a watered down rollout once implementation actually starts.
The CADENA Act Blockchain Budget Plan Waits on One Committee
House Bill 6898 has sat with the Committee on Information and Communications Technology since March 18, 2026. House Bill 6761 remains pending at the committee level as well. Neither has a scheduled hearing. This is the same procedural pattern HemosPH has tracked elsewhere in the current Congress: floor votes get the headlines, but committee referral and hearing scheduling are where reform bills actually live or die. A bill can carry unanimous Senate support and a presidential certification and still go nowhere, because the chamber that controls its next step controls the calendar, not the vote count.
Aquino’s public pressure campaign works only as long as it holds attention. Once the anniversary post cycles out of the news feed, the CADENA Act blockchain budget plan returns to being one more certified priority bill sitting in a committee queue with dozens of others, and nothing in House procedure forces a vote on any particular timeline.
Naga Already Showed the Technology Is Not the Hard Part
Naga City’s People’s Budget Portal, launched in June 2026, is a working demonstration that the technical side of this problem is already solved. The city built a production system that tracks proposed spending against Department of Budget and Management submission formats, released the software as open source, and made it available for any local government to copy. No national mandate exists forcing other cities to adopt it. Deployment stayed entirely voluntary, and the cities where budget opacity is most politically useful remain the least likely to opt in on their own.
CADENA faces the same structural risk at the national level, just with higher stakes. Passing a disclosure law and building a working system are two different accomplishments, and neither guarantees the third: consistent enforcement across every agency the law is supposed to cover. A CADENA Act blockchain budget system that exists on paper but ships without a funded rollout schedule risks becoming Naga’s portal problem multiplied across every national agency at once. Without a funded implementation timeline and a compliance deadline attached to the bill, the plan could clear the House, get signed, and still take years to actually change how a given agency handles its procurement paperwork.
Procurement Opacity Keeps Paying Rent Until This Passes
The practices CADENA is designed to expose keep operating exactly as before for every month the bill sits unpassed. Government procurement in the Philippines already shows a documented pattern where technical specifications get written narrowly enough to functionally lock bidding to a single vendor while remaining formally compliant with procurement law, producing awards that land near the full approved budget with limited genuine competition. A recent DICT technology contract followed exactly that pattern, and it survived scrutiny because the underlying bid documents and cost breakdowns were difficult to access after the fact, often gated behind formal requests to the awarding agency’s own bids and awards committee.
A functioning CADENA Act blockchain budget system would put those documents in public view as the procurement happens, not after a formal request months later. Until the House moves, the agencies and contractors who benefit from that difficulty face no new pressure to change how they operate.
The Calendar Decides This, Not the Anniversary Post
What happens to the CADENA Act blockchain budget plan next depends on a committee calendar in the House, not on how many senators voted for it in December or how many people saw Aquino’s post this week. The Committee on Information and Communications Technology can schedule a hearing, sit on the bill through the rest of the current Congress, or let it lapse entirely once this term ends, and each of those outcomes carries no political cost attached to a specific decision the way a recorded floor vote would. Every agency and contractor currently operating under the disclosure standards CADENA would replace keeps operating under those standards for exactly as long as that committee decides to wait.
Track more regulatory shifts that affect your business in Policy & Regulation section of Hemos PH.
