What It Means
- NFA Palay Procurement Rules just changed. It now eases the burden on farmers
- The NFA lowered its moisture content floor for dry palay from 12% to 11%, allowing more farmers to qualify for the ₱21/kg buying price without being downgraded on technical grounds.
- The buying price itself was not raised and sits below the ₱23 to ₱30/kg PRICERS range the NFA used in 2025.
- The NFA entered 2026 having purchased only 22.86% of its annual palay procurement target as of December 2025, a 58.8% decline from the prior year.
- Import liberalization under the Rice Tariffication Law suppressed the national average farmgate price of dry palay by 24.62% in 2025, from ₱23.48/kg to ₱17.70/kg, the structural root of what this rule change is reacting to.
On February 26, the National Food Authority revised its NFA palay procurement rules, widening the acceptable moisture content for dry palay from a 12 to 14% range to 11 to 14%, and redefining its pest standard to “visibly free from pests.” The DA described it as aligning procurement policy with ground realities. What the statement left out was why those ground realities deteriorated to begin with.
The national average farmgate price of dry palay fell 24.62% in 2025, dropping from ₱23.48 per kilo the previous year to ₱17.70 per kilo. That collapse did not happen in isolation. It came after the government’s rice import liberalization policy, anchored in the Rice Tariffication Law of 2019 and reinforced by Executive Order 62 in 2024, which cut rice import tariffs to 15%, flooded the market with cheaper imported grain. Private traders, absorbing the oversupply signal, pushed farmgate offers below production cost in some regions, with prices in Mindanao falling as low as ₱7/kg at the worst points of the wet season harvest.
The February 2026 rule adjustment is the government’s operational response to the downstream effects of its own upstream policy decisions.
What the Rule Change Actually Does
The technical adjustment is narrow. Dry palay with moisture content at 11%, previously rejected outright by the NFA because it was considered too brittle and prone to breakage during milling, now qualifies for the full ₱21/kg buying price. The pest acceptance standard, which previously led to rejections for minor or non-material defects, has been simplified to “visibly free from pests.”
Both changes reduce the rate of technical rejection at the buying station. They do not change how much money the NFA has available to buy palay. They do not change the buying price. They do not change how quickly farmers get paid after delivery, a persistent disadvantage relative to private traders who offer immediate cash.
The NFA buying price of ₱21/kg for dry palay, while above current market rates in distress-selling regions, is below the agency’s own PRICERS range from 2025, when the government was paying ₱23 to ₱30/kg for dry palay. Farmers who sold to the NFA last dry season at the higher rate are now looking at a lower government offer, with a slightly wider eligibility window as the consolation.
The Procurement Gap This Is Trying to Close
| Period | NFA Buying Price (Dry Palay) | National Average Farmgate Price | Procurement vs Target |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 (dry season) | ₱23 to ₱30/kg (PRICERS) | ₱23.48/kg avg | Not disclosed |
| 2025 full year | ₱23 to ₱30/kg (PRICERS) | ₱17.70/kg avg (down 24.62%) | 22.86% of target as of Dec 2025 |
| 2026 (current) | ₱21/kg (fixed) | Recovery underway in select regions | Target: 932,522 bags |
As of December 2025, the NFA had procured 213,184 bags of palay, 22.86% of its annual target of 932,522 bags, and a 58.8% decline from the volume purchased the prior year. Peak dry harvest arrives in March and April. The revised NFA palay procurement rules are designed to absorb more volume during that window and close part of that gap before the fiscal year tightens further.
NFA Administrator Larry Lacson acknowledged the timing was deliberate. When supply is highest, farmgate prices are most vulnerable to softening. Widening procurement eligibility at that precise moment is the logical operational move. The question is whether the NFA has the budget to act on it.
The Budget Constraint Nobody Is Talking About
The 2026 General Appropriations Act allocated ₱9 billion for NFA palay procurement, with approximately ₱5 billion carried over from 2025, bringing the total available fund to roughly ₱14 billion. At the current buying price of ₱21/kg for dry palay, that fund could theoretically purchase around 667 million kilos of unmilled rice, enough to cover the buffer stock mandate on paper.
The problem is that the same procurement fund is being drawn on to support the government’s ₱20/kg subsidized rice program. Lacson stated directly that if the ₱20 rice program depletes the fund quickly, the NFA could be left with as little as ₱5 billion for open market procurement, not enough by his own assessment to influence traders’ prices.
A rule change that expands eligibility but leaves the spending constraint in place does not solve the volume problem. It reorganizes who qualifies to sell into a fixed buying pool.
Private Traders Still Hold the Structural Advantage
The NFA’s long-standing disadvantage against private traders is not primarily about rejection criteria. It is about speed. Private traders offer cash at the farm or at a nearby buying station, with no documentation queue, no moisture testing formality, and no waiting period. TheNFA Palay Procurement Rules process, formal delivery, grading inspection, paperwork, and payment processing, takes longer, even when the farmer’s palay now meets the revised standard.
For smallholder farmers who need liquidity to cover production input costs for the next planting cycle, the NFA’s structural slowness has historically outweighed its price premium. The February rule revision does not address that gap. It reduces one source of rejection but leaves the operational friction that drives farmers toward private buyers largely intact.
The deeper infrastructure problem is also unaddressed. Many smallholder farmers produce naturally drier palay because they lack proper mechanical drying facilities. A pending House bill proposes mandating the NFA to establish free rice drying facilities in all rice-producing municipalities, a direct structural response to the same problem the moisture rule adjustment is trying to work around. That bill has not passed.
Where the Structural Fix Is Sitting
The RICE Act, filed as House Bill No. 1 and Senate Bill No. 1618, proposes restoring the NFA’s regulatory powers, including the ability to set palay floor prices, directly sell rice to the public, inspect warehouses, and purchase up to a quarter of the national harvest. Without that legislation, the NFA remains restricted to its emergency buffer stock mandate under the Rice Tariffication Law, limited to buying from local farmers and releasing stocks only during declared emergencies or calamities.
The DA and the legislative leadership have both signaled intent to pass the RICE Act. It has not been enacted. Until it is, the NFA operates as a procurement agency with a fixed budget, a degraded market position, and no formal authority to intervene in price formation the way it once could.
The February 26 rule adjustment is, in that context, the best available move within a constrained operational reality. It is not a policy correction. It is a technical recalibration made necessary by the structural damage that came before it.
Operators watching rice input costs, rural lending exposure, or agri-supply chain pricing should track the RICE Act’s progress in Congress, not the moisture content range, as the actual signal of where government intervention capacity in the rice sector is heading.
Sources:
- NFA Palay Procurement Rulestarget vs actual volume
- NFA request for ₱18 billion procurement budget for 2026; DA push to restore NFA powers via Congress
Track more regulatory shifts that affect your business in Policy & Regulation section of Hemos PH.
